The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Restructing Debian

Joey Hess wrote:
>
> I don't see any reason why I should get more votes than
> people who maintain only a few of the more important packages.

The same applies for me too. Every two months I add one package to the
journal PJ and when the mandatory year will be passed for me, I'll have
10 votes doing a lot less work than the work I do for one package like
man or groff (which is little, anyway :-).

Maybe you can add a coefficient based on the Section + Priority fields?
(the higher for base packages, lower for games, null for stuff like docs
etc.)

Also the amount of time is a candidate for this calculation.


> I think we should go with one maintainer, one vote.

But maybe this is the Simpler Thing (tm).


Fabrizio
-- 
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| e-mail: fpolacco@megabaud.fi    fpolacco@debian.org         |
| http://megabaud.fi/~fpolacco/   Join the UKI Linux Project! |
| fingerprint 70 1A 72 2D 2B C8 A5 63 7A C2 CC E0 2A 54 AE DA |
| finger: fpolacco@megabaud.fi    fpolacco@master.debian.org  |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+


--
Please respect the confidentiality of material on the debian-private list.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com